Why is the story of an Hour considered realistic?
Why is the story of an Hour considered realistic?
Why is the story of an Hour considered realistic?
Chopin’s story is realistic because it leaves readers with the feeling that the events of the story could happen to someone in real life. Chopin gives us a nuanced story of a woman’s reaction to her husband’s supposed death. Louise Mallard, the protagonist, has two reactions to this news.
Why is the story of an Hour considered to be a feminist text?
A Feminist Perspective In the short story, Chopin reveals a deep rooted problem women faced in marital relationships. As in “The Story of an Hour” she plotted the idea that women were oppressed through unhappy marriages. Through this idea, she voiced that marriages were institutions that put restraints upon women.
What is the literary term for sarcasm?
Sarcasm is a literary device that uses irony to mock someone or something or convey contempt. Synonyms for sarcasm are affront, barb, brickbat, cut, dart, dig, dis, epithet, gird, out-down, and slight.
What is the moral of the story of an hour?
Thereof, what is the moral lesson of the story of an hour? The moral of the story undermines the famous saying “the truth shall set you free”; Mrs. Mallard finds freedom in the false belief that her husband is dead, and dies when she faces the truth.
What is a feminism?
Feminism, the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes. Although largely originating in the West, feminism is manifested worldwide and is represented by various institutions committed to activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests.
What is the actual reason for Mrs Mallard’s death?
However, it seems that her death was due to the fact that her newly found freedom and joy was stolen from her. Instead of a loving, ill wife, Mrs. Mallard is actually seen as ungrateful and unfaithful to her husband. Chongyue and Lihua conclude that such a woman cannot live on this earth, therefore, causing her death.
What is ironic about Mrs Mallard’s death?
The irony behind her death lies in the fact that she does not die because of the grief she should feel at the news of her husband’s death. Instead, she dies because she cannot handle the thought of having her new found freedom (“”Free! Body and soul free!” ) ripped away. Her heart simply could not stand the thought.