What did EP Thompson argue?

What did EP Thompson argue?

Thompson authored Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism, published in 1967, which posits that reliance on clock-time is a result of the European Industrial Revolution and that neither industrial capitalism nor the creation of the modern state would have been possible without the imposition of synchronic …

Why was EP Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class such an important book for historians?

Thompson demonstrated how working people were not just worked upon by historical forces, but were able, by their own political agency, to forge themselves as a class for itself. This analysis should strengthen our political will today.

How does EP Thompson define class?

Thompson’s dialectical analysis defines class as a s t r u c t u r e d p r o c e s s w h i c h h a p p e n s in p e o p l e ‘ s relationships. He views thinking and being as a unity which means that man’s life and labour are not divorced from man’s thinking.

What does history from below mean?

A people’s history, or history from below, is a type of historical narrative which attempts to account for historical events from the perspective of common people rather than leaders. There is an emphasis on disenfranchised, the oppressed, the poor, the nonconformists, and otherwise marginal groups.

Is EP Thompson Marxist?

He remained a dedicated Marxist, however, and cofounded a new journal, The New Left Review, around which thousands of other disaffected leftists united in forming a noncommunist political movement, the New Left.

Who Favoured looking history from below?

In the 20th century, the historian whose works inspired the left tradition of History from Below was Georges Lefebvre. He empirically grounded the study of peasantry in the context of the French Revolution.

What is Althusser’s theory?

Althusser contends that ideology has a material existence because “an ideology always exists in an apparatus, and its practice, or practices” (Lenin 112). Ideology always manifests itself through actions, which are “inserted into practices” (Lenin 114), for example, rituals, conventional behavior, and so on.